Welcome to the ion21Swiss system.   Designed by a team of experts for promoting fair-play decision making.

No cost for first trial.   Implementation support provided.

ion21Swiss - Overview

The perfect solution to boardroom team decision making, group-level decision making, and cooperation-conflict resolutions.

Applications in Automobile sharing, Start-up businesess and various other domains.

SwissHike Yoga Alliance - SUGGESTED

SwissHike Yoga Alliance - Suggested

ion21Swiss - PURPOSE and GOALS

ion21Swiss


Benefits of the system


ETHICAL fair play decision-making through a weighted-voting, reducing interpersonal conflicts and social tensions, strengthening interpersonal trust and team spirit

Purpose and Goals of the system:

- unleashing the hidden potential of fully informed team members
- sustainable development with better perspective, feelings and results
- forecasted team decision-making respecting the local and global priorities

ion21Swiss - SwissHike Yoga Alliance: 100% Transparency = 100% BENEFITS
Kandersteg Oeschinensee

ion21Swiss - Forecasted Decision Making

ion21Swiss


Navigation PROGNOSIS


Publicly TRANSPARENT Navigation Prognosis and the verification predicted values of key parameters with reality in the geometric prolonged intervals of check points (2, 4, 8, 16 ... days / weeks / months) enable to make qualified team decisions, to apply Stop state (re-voting) and to cooperate effectively on the global level.

Optimization proposals are qualified by:

- GENERAL prognosis of the Primary proposal
- SPECIFIC prognosis of the Secondary proposal
- NAVIGATION prognosis of the Navigation proposal

Kandersteg Oeschinensee

ion21Swiss - ATTRIBUTES and FEATURES


PARAMETRIC SYSTEM optimizing the parameters setting
FEEDBACK SYSTEM through Info, Opti, Navi processes
ITERATIVE SYSTEM using sequential iterative steps

MORE INFO
ion21Swiss PDF

ion21Swiss


Iterative nature


ion21Swiss - Iterative nature

ion21Swiss is a generalized Swiss model of teamwork, leading to better perspective, feelings and results, enriched by taking into account the motivation factors of Activity + Competence + Investment.

ion21Swiss system emphasizes the full utilization of the team potential in finding the best solution and its implementation:
- expert system where voters can follow expert discussions, share their competency votes to preferred team experts
- universal system that includes different decision-making models, according to the parameters setting and votes sharing

A key element of the team decision making is the quality of optimization proposals to improve the cooperation strategy and parameters presented and assessed by all team members. The Primary, Secondary and Navigation proposals qualified by Analysis + Conformity + Prognosis ACP-supplements are optimized through 3 proposal's corrections.


Thematic debate - ion21Swiss team members can on the ion21Portal transmit or improve ideas and align different positions

Primary proposal - the initial version of a proposal with Strategic analysis, Navigation conformity and General prognosis

Objective discussion - key aspects of a submitted proposal are considered in a objective debate on the ion21Portal

Primary support - the submitted Primary proposal (PP) can be refused or accepted if it reaches the PP support level

Secondary proposals - specific variants of a proposal with Economical analysis, Local conformity and Specific prognosis

Expert discussion - detailed aspects of an accepted PP are presented by team experts «« Competency votes sharing

Secondary support - the submitted Secondary proposal (SP) can be refused or accepted if it reaches the SP support level

1st correction - accepted Secondary proposals can be modified by submitters before the first voting round

R1 voting - 1st voting round with a weight of shared ACI-votes to select 2 preferred variants of a proposal

2nd correction - two winning Secondary proposals can be modified by submitters before the sedond voting round

R2 voting - 2nd voting round with a equal weight of 2 votes to choose the winning secondary proposal

Navigation proposal - the final version of a proposal with Ecological analysis, Global conformity and Parametric prognosis

R3 voting - 3rd voting round with a equal weight of 1 vote to accept or refuse the Navigation proposal (NP)

Realization - accepted NP can be implemented by experts who preferred the winning variant - Implementation team

Verification - Inspection team from experts who preferred the opposing variant can check the forecasted key parameters


PARAMETERS


Parametric nature


ion21Swiss - Parametric nature

Proposal's Support LEVELS

Primary proposal - PPL

Secondary proposal - SPL

Navigation proposal - NPL

Decision-making MODES

Acute

Normal

Precise

Primary Proposal Support

Primary Proposal Acute - PPA

Primary Proposal Normal - PPN

Primary Proposal Precise - PPP

Secondary Proposal Support

Secondary Proposal Acute - SPA

Secondary Proposal Normal - SPN

Secondary Proposal Precise - SPP

Sharing Competencies

Sharing Competencies Acute - SCA

Sharing Competenc. Normal - SCN

Sharing Competenc. Precise - SCP

Voting Round 1st

Voting Round 1st Acute - R1A

Voting Round 1st Normal - R1N

Voting Round 1st Precise - R1P

Voting Round 2nd

Voting Round 2nd Acute - R2A

Voting Round 2nd Normal - R2N

Voting Round 2nd Precise - R2P

Voting Round 3rd

Voting Round 3rd Acute - R3A

Voting Round 3rd Normal - R3N

Voting Round 3rd Precise - R3P

Coefficients of COMPETENCY

High-school general - HGC

High-school in a field - HFC

University general - UGC

University in a field - UFC

Practice general - PGC

Practice in a field - PFC

Activity SUPERVISORS

Number of members - SVM

Duration of the term - SVT

Refunded INVESTMENT force

Refunded Investment Force - RIF

Project MOTIVATION Parameters

DISPOSAL rights

TERM lengths

WAGES policy

ACP-proposals


Primary proposal - PP

Secondary proposal - SP

Navigation proposal - NP


Analysis - Ana

Conformity - Con

Prognosis - Pro

ANALYSIS

PP: Strategic aspects, Strategic context, Strategic impacts

SP: Economical aspects, Economic context, Economical impacts

NP: Ecological aspects, Ecological context, Environmental impacts

Primary proposal

Ana: Strategic analysis

Con: Navigation dimensions

Pro: General forecast

CONFORMITY

PP: Navigation dimensions: Better Perspective, Better Feelings, Better Results

SP: Local priorities, Current status, Future impacts

NP: Global priorities, Current status, Future impacts

Secondary proposal

Ana: Economical analysis

Con: Local priorities

Pro: Specific forecast

PROGNOSIS

PP: General local forecast, General global impacts, General key parameters

SP: Specific local forecast, Specific global impacts, Specific key parameters

NP: Key parameters, Forecasted values, Tolerance intervals

Navigation proposal

Ana: Ecological analysis

Con: Global priorities

Pro: Parametric forecast

Quick Connect : For any questions you can email us at : isc@indiasmeforum.org or have a Whatsapp chat with us on : + 91 7710000959/960

ION-processes: Information+Optimization+Navigation

ion21INFO


Team Information


The 1st FAIR PLAY RIGHT

Sharing relevant data connected with a project among all team members. The fundamental principle of a successful teamwork is the full access to all information related to a given project. The knowledge base is needed for drafting of optimization proposals providing the best quality results.

PROJECT INFO Structure

Project information are shared among all team members in a common structured form: Title - topic name, Author - topic submitter, Abstract - short text version, Report - full version, Links - details to a given topic, Discussion - comments of team members.

Kandersteg Oeschinensee

ion21Tree

THEMATIC DEBATE

Thematic discussion around project issues in ion21Forum on ion21Swiss Portal provides a platform for sharing inspirational ideas. Key topics how to improve the cooperation parameters and strategy can be presented as Primary proposals.

Act + Inv  VOTES SHARING

Activity and Investment Votes are shared occasionally according to:
7 Activity Votes - based on records in the Activity Table of a team member
7 Investment Votes - with respect to data in a corresponding Investment Table

Kandersteg Blüemlisalphorn

ion21OPTI


Team Optimization


The 2nd FAIR PLAY RIGHT

Each member of the ion21Swiss team may submit a proposal to optimize the team's strategy or parameters of cooperation. Optimization proposals can be submitted individually or by several members together.

Optimization ACP-PROPOSALS

Proposals have to be qualified by Analysis, Conformity and Prognosis:
Analysis - Strategic, Economical and Ecological aspects+context+impacts
Conformity - with Navigation dimensions, Local and Global priorities
Prognosis - General, Specific and Parametric forecasted impact

Kandersteg Fründenhorn

ion21TreeOpti

Primary ACP-PROPOSAL

The initial version of a proposal supplemented by:
Strategic analysis - strategic aspects, context and impacts
Navigation conformity - complience with Navigation dimensions
General prognosis - general consequences and key parameters

Secondary ACP-PROPOSALS

Specific variants of the primary proposal supplemented by:
Economical analysis - economic aspects, context and impacts
Local conformity - complience with Local priorities
Specific prognosis - specific consequences and key parameters

Kandersteg Gasterntal

ion21Processes

OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION

Objective discussion on a given theme in ion21Forum on ion21Swiss Portal starts by submitting the Primary proposal and ends with refusing this Primary or respective Navigation proposal. All team members are welcomed to participate.

PROPOSAL'S SUPPORT

For submitted proposals has to be found a support among team members:
Primary support - Primary Proposal Level (PPL % of supported members)
Secondary support - Secondary Proposal Level (SPL % ion21Parameter)

Gemmi Schwarenbach

EXPERT DISCUSSION

Expert discussion on a given theme in ion21Forum on ion21Swiss Portal starts by accepting the Primary proposal and runs to the start of a Navigation process. Experts = team members qualified by knowledge declared in Competency Table.

Com-VOTES SHARING

Competency Votes are shared to preferred team members during the expert discussion on a given optimization proposal with respect to:
7 Competency Votes - records in the Competency Table of a team member

Kandersteg Kandertal

ion21NAVI


Team Navigation


The 3rd FAIR PLAY RIGHT

All team members take part in the decision-making on strategic guidelines and cooperation parameters. Voting rights may be exercised either in person or can be delegated to one or more other colleagues.

Voting rights DELEGATION

Decision-making competencies can be delegated to other members whereas:
- delegate FREE VOTES only: 3-Activity + 3-Competency + 3-Investment
- Tied + Fixed Votes automatically compensate the Shoud Have deviations
- delegation can be changed or terminated before starting the Navigation

Blüemlisalphorn

ion21TreeNavi

NAVIGATION ACP-PROPOSAL

Winning variant of merged secondary proposals supplemented by:
Ecological Analysis - environmental aspects, context and impacts
Global Conformity - complience with Global priorities
Parametric Prognosis - Forecasted values and Tolerance intervals

The forecasted Navigation proposal can be accepted or refused in the third R3 Voting Round with equl weight of one vote per team member:
Navigation support - Navigation Proposal Level (NPL % ion21Parameter)

Western Gastertal

PROPOSAL'S CORRECTIONS

A key element of the team decision making is the quality of optimization proposals enabling to improve the cooperation strategy and parameters.

Supported variants of an optimization proposal can be improved and merged during the Navigation process using 3 proposal's corrections:
First correction of supported Secondary proposals before R1 Voting Round
Second correction of two preferred variants before the 2nd Voting Round R2
Third correction of the Navigation proposal before the 3rd Voting Round R3

Eastern Gastertal

ACI-factors: Activity+Competence+Investment

ion21Swiss Team
MOTIVATION
Factors


ion21Motivation

COMPETENCE   ion21Swiss Table

Competence table

Competence table Team member registers education and experience on ion21Swiss Portal in the Team COMPETENCY table which includes the following fields:
Competence Item Specification
Duration Time: From - To - Years
Competence Field of education or experience
Competence Type: Primary school, High school, University, Practice
General Coefficient for a competence out of the proposal's field
Field Coefficient for a competence in the proposal's field
IsField flag indicating if a given proposal Is competence in Field
CYears = general or field Coefficient x Years of competence
CYears Sum = total sum of all competency items

COM% = % value of CYearsTAB ByTab = votes by COM% Shared = votes after sharingGAP = Shared - ByTab

3 + 3 + 1 = 7  Com
Votes Sharing
Competence votes

INVESTMENT   ion21Swiss Table

Investment table

Investment table Team member registers financial project investments on ion21Swiss Portal in the Team INVESTMENT table which includes the following fields:
Date - Purpose - Account - Entry - Note of a financial project contribution
Currency for a given Amount
Amount in a given Currency
Euro Value = Amount in EUR
Refunded Investment: Date, Euro Value, Percentage of invested Amount
INVforce EuroINV = Refunded Investment Force parameter correction
EuroINV Force Sum = total sum of all investment items

INV% = % value of EuroINVTAB ByTab = votes by INV% Shared = votes after sharingGAP = Shared - ByTab

3 + 3 + 1 = 7  Inv
Votes Sharing
Investment votes

21 shared VOTES = 7-Act + 7-Comp + 7-Inv

7 + 7 + 7 = 21
Votes Sharing
3 + 3 + 1 = 7


3 FREE Votes
3 TIED Votes
1 FIXED Vote


ion21Motivation

COMPETENCY   Votes Sharing

Competency votes

Competency sharing Each team member shares his Competency Votes on ion21Swiss Portal in the Sharing COM-VOTES table which includes the following fields:
Member - team member identified by an ID and Code name
vC1 vC2 vC3 - 3 FREE VOTES shared free to other members
vC4 vC5 vC6 - 3 TIED VOTES shared to reduce the VoteGAPs
vC7 - 1 FIXED VOTE kept by owner or free shared
TAB ByTab - votes distributed according to COM table
COM Shared - votes shared to a given team member
GAP = (Shared - ByTab) votes difference
Donor FROM WHOM are votes shared
Acceptor TO WHOM are votes shared

Team COMPETENCY
ion21Swiss Table
Competency table

INVESTMENT   Votes Sharing

Investment votes

Investment sharing Each team member shares his Investment Votes on ion21Swiss Portal in the Sharing INV-VOTES table which includes the following fields:
Member - team member identified by an ID and Code name
vI1 vI2 vI3 - 3 FREE VOTES shared free to other members
vI4 vI5 vI6 - 3 TIED VOTES shared to reduce the VoteGAPs
vI7 - 1 FIXED VOTE kept by owner or free shared
TAB ByTab - votes distributed according to INV table
INV Shared - votes shared to a given team member
GAP = (Shared - ByTab) votes difference
Donor FROM WHOM are votes shared
Acceptor TO WHOM are votes shared

Team INVESTMENT
ion21Swiss Table
Investment table

ION-navigation: R1 + R2 + R3  Voting Rounds

The 1st ROUND


Select TWO PREFERRED secondary PROPOSALS


Using SHARED VOTES


C1 = FIRST proposal's CORRECTION

Supported Secondary proposals can be updated at the end of the Expert discussion before starting the 1st Voting round.

R1 = FIRST voting ROUND

Using SHARED VOTES during the 1st voting round team members select two preferred variants from all supported Secondary proposals.
One or more proposal's variants can be graded either supported or declined.
Every decision should be justified by reasons explaining pros or cos.
Decisions and reasons are displayed at the end of voting but hidden on the fly.
Duration of the R1 run in Acute (hours) - Normal (days) - Precise (weeks) mode is set by ion21Swiss parameters R1A - R1N - R1P.

Kandersteg Bire

ion21TreeR1

FIRST voting round Team members deside using SHARED VOTES in the 1st VOTING ROUND table with weights:
(-3) SURELY NO  - with HIGH certainty
(-2) RATHER NO  - with MIDDLE certainty
(-1) MAYBE NO  - with LOW certainty
(+1) MAYBE YES  - with LOW certainty
(+2) RATHER YES  - with MIDDLE certainty
(+3) SURELY YES  - with HIGH certainty
= 7 Degrees of Freedom  including (0) NONE

Following fields has to be filled in:
Member identified by an ID and Code name
Votes shared sum Total and Used by voting
Decision with weight Nb and Votes count
Why and for what - feedback to others


The 2nd ROUND


Select ONE WINNING secondary PROPOSAL


Using TWO VOTES


C2 = SECOND proposal's CORRECTION

Two preferred Secondary proposals can be updated at the end of the R1 Voting round before starting the 2nd Voting round.

R2 = SECOND voting ROUND

Using TWO VOTES during the 2nd Voting round team members select the winning variant from two preferred Secondary proposals.
One or both proposal's variants can be either supported or declined.
Every decision should be justified by reasons explaining pros or cos.
Decisions and reasons are displayed at the end of voting but hidden on the fly.
Duration of the R2 run in Acute (hours) - Normal (days) - Precise (weeks) mode is set by ion21Swiss parameters R2A - R2N - R2P.

Kandersteg Gällihore

ion21TreeR2

SECOND voting round Team members deside using TWO VOTES in the 2nd VOTING ROUND table with weights:
(-6) SURELY NO  - with HIGH certainty
(-5) RATHER NO  - with MIDDLE certainty
(-4) MAYBE NO  - with LOW certainty
(+4) MAYBE YES  - with LOW certainty
(+5) RATHER YES  - with MIDDLE certainty
(+6) SURELY YES  - with HIGH certainty
= 7 Degrees of Freedom  including (0) NONE

Following fields has to be filled in:
Member identified by an ID and Code name
Votes shared sum Total and Used by voting
Decision with weight Nb and Votes count
Why and for what - feedback to others


The 3rd ROUND


Confirm the NAVIGATION forecasted PROPOSAL


Using ONE VOTE


C3 = THIRD proposal's CORRECTION

The winning Secondary proposal can be updated at the end of the R2 Voting round before starting the 3rd Voting round in the form of Navigation proposal.

R3 = THIRD voting ROUND

With an equal weight of ONE VOTE during the 3rd Voting round team members accept or refuse the Navigation proposal.
Sum of votes used in the previous rounds are not taking into account.
Every decision should be justified by reasons explaining pros or cos.
Decisions and reasons are displayed at the end of voting but hidden on the fly.
Duration of the R3 run in Acute (hours) - Normal (days) - Precise (weeks) mode is set by ion21Swiss parameters R3A - R3N - R3P.

Kandersteg Altels

ion21TreeR3

THIRD voting round Team members deside using ONE VOTE in the 3rd VOTING ROUND table at points:
(-7) NO  - Navigation proposal unwanted
(+7) YES  - Navigation proposal wanted
The Navigation proposal is accepted if it reaches the percentage level of compliance given by the ion21Swiss parameter NPL.

Following fields has to be filled in:
Member identified by an ID and Code name
Votes shared sum Total and Used by voting
Decision with weight Nb and Votes count
Why and for what - feedback to others

M21 Grouping: Members 21 Cell Architecture

ion21Grouping


Members: 21 per Cell


ion21M21

M21 Vertical Architecture

Group of up to 21 members enables to follow ideas and proposals of all colleagues using the ion21Swiss cooperation system.
A complex project team with more than 40 people should be therefore structured into ion21Cells with 21 (+/- 3) members.

M21 Pyramid

M21 Pyramid Run

ion21Grouping enables to each ion21Swiss team member act as a Sovereign on the Base cell level and became a Presenter of Primary and Secondary proposals on higher levels among 21 members up to the Top level.

Taj Mahal

1-2-3 run
PRIMARY Proposal (PP)

Left A run: (1) Base  (2) Top  (3) Base
PP down2up support & down info if accepted

3-4-5 run
SECONDARY Proposals (SPs)

Right A run: (3) Base  (4) Top  (5) Base
SPs down2up selection & Navigation proposal

M21 architecture

M21 A-LEFT


PRIMARY Proposal
1-2-3 Presentation


1-2-3 run of the PRIMARY Proposal

Support of the Primary proposal (PP) starts at the Base level by Sovereigns of the cell, where the PP was submitted:
M1 point - one round at the Base cell level with a weight of one vote (YES or NO).
The PP is accepted if its support reaches the Primary Proposal Level (PPL % of supported members).

The submitter of the PP accepted on the Base level becomes its Presenter up to the Top level;
Presenters of the former proposal became Delegates on higher levels (initially delegated by the cell of lower level).
Higher levels above the Base 1-cell level: 2-board, 3-ship, 4-fleet ... to the Top level M2

Presenters support (YES) or decline (NO) the PP with the weight of votes according to the number of Sovereigns represented.
The Left A of M21 symbolizes assessment of the PP from Base to Top level (M1  M2), by Presenters only from one branch.
PP approved up to the Top level is sent (M2  M3) to all Sovereigns concerned who can formulate Secondary proposals.

ion21M21L

M1-M2 run UP
PRIMARY Proposal (PP)

Left A12 run: (M1) Base level  (M2) Top level
PP support by Sovereigns and Presenters

M2-M3 run DOWN
Supported into Secondary

Left A23 run: (M2) Top level  (M3) Base level
Submit Secondary proposals if PP accepted

M21 left A run

M21 A-RIGHT


SECONDARY Proposals
3-4-5 Presentation


3-4-5 run of the SECONDARY Proposals

Harmonization of the Secondary proposals (SPs) starts at the Base level by Sovereigns of all cells affected by the PP.
Submitter of the winning SP becomes his Presenter on higher levels (2-board, 3-ship, 4-fleet ... to the Top level M4).

Sovereigns harmonize supported SPs in two rounds, in first and second rounds R1 and R2 on the Base level (point M3):
R1: by shared ACI-votes of Activity, Competence and Investments in points (-3), (-2), (-1), 0, (+1), (+2), (+3)
R2: by two votes in points (-6), (-5), (-4), 0, (+4), (+5), (+6); with stating their choice to others in writing

Presenters harmonize the winning SPs in two voting rounds, the first R1 and the second R2, on higher levels:
R1: by a sum of the weighted votes from the previous 1st round in points (-3), (-2), (-1), 0, (+1), (+2), (+3)
R2: by a sum of the weighted votes from the previous 2nd round in points (-6), (-5), (-4), 0, (+4), (+5), (+6)

Sovereigns approve the Navigation proposal NP in the third voting round R3 on the Base level (point M5):
R3: by one vote in points (-7), 0, (+7); with giving feedback to others by stating the choice in writing
NP is accepted if it reaches the level of compliance given by the ion21Swiss parameter NPL in the absolute majority of cells.

ion21M21R

M3-M4 run UP
SECONDARY Proposals (SPs)

Right A34 run: (M3) Base level  (M4) Top level
SPs selection by Sovereigns and Presenters

M4-M5 run DOWN
NAVIGATION Proposal (NP)

Right A45 run: (M4) Top level  (M5) Base level
Approval of Navigation proposal by Sovereigns

M21 right A run